The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable by the lower court’s imprisonment (ten months of imprisonment, confiscation).

2. The judgment is an element for sentencing favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects the fact that the defendant's family members and branch members appear to be deep in social ties, such as the defendant's desire to take the defendant's preference, and that a sum of 3.8 million won was deposited to the victim E and S.

However, the sum of the victims of the instant frauds is about 6 persons and about 25 million won in total. The instant frauds constitute the so-called “Singing,” which constitute the so-called “Sing,” and not only the nature of the crime is planned and intelligent, but also constitutes a serious crime with a structure of massing a large number of victims. The “Singing,” crimes constitute a serious crime with a structure of massing a large number of victims. While it is practically difficult to detect and punish a person who planned and directed the crime in China, it is practically difficult to detect and punish the person who planned and directed the crime in China, and thus, there is a need to punish the so-called “sing,” so-called “sing,” in which cash is withdrawn and delivered in Korea. Even if the Defendant had a history of being punished by a fine due to the violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, the Defendant again commits the instant crime, even though having been subject to the punishment of a fine due to the Defendant’s violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, and most unfavorable factors in the sentencing and sentencing of the Defendant’s amount of damage.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.