All of the public prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is Defendant B’s company processing communications and electronic parts, and Defendant A is the representative of Defendant B’s company.

Defendant

A Any person who has acquired a reproduction of a program made in violation of copyright of a program with the knowledge of such fact shall not use it for business.

On November 30, 2015, from around March 22, 2016 to around March 22, 2016, the Defendant established 8 program reproduction program, a copyrighted work of the Victim CNC software (CNC) company, 8 program, and 136(2)4 of the Copyright Act, and 136(1)4 of the Copyright Act, and 136(2)4 of the Copyright Act, respectively. The Defendant infringed on the copyright of the victims. (b) The Defendant Company B, a representative of the Defendant, violated the copyright of the said victims regarding the Defendant’s work at the above time and at the above place. The facts charged in the instant case are that the Defendants were not prosecuted pursuant to Article 136(2)4, Article 124(1)3(A) through Article 141 of the Copyright Act, Article 136(1)4 of the Copyright Act, Article 136(1)4 of the Copyright Act, and Article 136(1)4(2)4) of the Copyright Act.