beta
Text
1. The defendant's Suwon District Court's Sung-nam Branch 2015Gadan15606 collection amount against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
Basic Facts
A. On May 30, 2007, the Defendant filed an application with the Suwon District Court for provisional attachment of KRW 10,000,000 among D’s claim for the return of lease deposit against D’s Plaintiffs, and the Suwon District Court decided on June 18, 2007 to accept it (2007Kadan6793).
B. The Defendant filed a lawsuit against D on June 22, 2007 against Suwon District Court Decision 2007Gaso23048, and the above court decided on June 28, 2007 that “D shall pay KRW 10,000,000 to the Defendant” and became final and conclusive on July 20, 2007.
C. On December 28, 2012, the Defendant requested the Suwon District Court 2012TT28171 to order the seizure and collection of the above claim. On January 2, 2013, the above court accepted the Defendant’s application and issued a seizure and collection order (hereinafter “instant seizure and collection order”) regarding KRW 10,000,000 among the lease deposit return claims against the Plaintiffs. The instant seizure and collection order reached the Plaintiffs on January 8, 2013.
On May 27, 2015, based on the instant order of seizure and collection, the Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiffs on May 27, 2015 against Suwon District Court Branch Branch 2015Gaso15606. On May 29, 2015, the said court rendered a decision on performance recommendation (hereinafter “the instant decision on performance recommendation”) to the effect that “the Plaintiffs shall pay to each Defendant KRW 10,000,000 and delay damages therefor,” and the instant decision on performance recommendation was finalized on June 17, 2015.
[Grounds for recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap's evidence Nos. 1, 4, 5, and 6, facts with this court, assertion of the purport of the whole pleadings, and summary of the plaintiffs' claims for determination, the plaintiffs entered into a lease agreement with Eul's wife E-ground Building Nos. 201 (hereinafter "the housing of this case") in Sung-nam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul, Seoul, and the plaintiffs' joint ownership, but did not enter into a lease agreement with D.