logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2020.10.15 2020고단3111
국민체육진흥법위반(도박등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person, other than the Seoul Olympic Sports Promotion Foundation or an entrusted business entity, shall provide property or property benefits to persons who correctly predicted the result by issuing sports betting tickets or similar things, or use them for gambling.

Nevertheless, on October 22, 2017, from around July 31, 2019 to around July 31, 2019, the Defendant connected 'B' to 'B', an illegal private Internet gambling site, using a mobile phone at the dwelling space of the Defendant, using the mobile phone at the dwelling space of the Defendant, and used the bank account (F) in the name of the Defendant Dong Jae-dong, etc. to 14 accounts, such as the E Bank account in the name of the bank in the name of the above gambling site (H), and remitted the total amount of KRW 513,853,90 in total over 1,179, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes, charged cyber money equivalent to the same amount. Prior to the implementation of various domestic and foreign sports games, the Defendant ambling in a way that, after betting the game money and lost the amount of betting money or was refunded the amount of dividends designated depending on whether or not.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant concerning D's court statement;

1. Details of entry into and departure from the EP transactions, and details of entry into and departure from B accounts;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to a copy of the invoice sent by two highest managers of the instant case, who reported internal investigation (the relevance between the person under suspicion and the “B”).

1. Article 48 subparagraph 3 of the National Sports Promotion Act and Article 26 (1) of the same Act, comprehensively including the choice of applicable laws and punishment for facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground of sentencing of the provisional payment order is that the criminal defendant illegally gamblings, and its nature is not good in light of the frequency and amount of the crime.

However, the defendant recognized the crime of this case and there is no record of criminal punishment.

arrow