logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.10.26 2017고단3265
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for three years, and for two years and six months, respectively.

Seized smartphones (D, white, alfa6).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are foreigners of Malaysia’s nationality, and from Malaysia’s personnel to Malaysia, the Defendants would be able to incur bonds upon the receipt of money from Malaysia to Korea and upon the expiration of the day.

“After receiving the proposal,” and accepting it, the Plaintiff came from the Malaysia on May 28, 2017 and entered the Republic of Korea through the Incheon Airport after being provided with the right to shut back and return air and criminal funds from the said Malaysia.

The Defendants conspired to play a role in the responsibility for withdrawal and transportation of the funds of the Red Cross, such as receiving money directly from the victims or delivering money stored by the victims in another place to the persons designated by the Organization upon receiving instructions from the said members, while investing in the Mogu Mo-gu Manelel.

1. Defendant A

A. In accordance with the above fraud offer with respect to the victim G, the Defendant 2: (a) was called the victim on May 29, 2017 and called the victim on May 29, 2017; and (b) whether the Defendant 2 was “H.”

He/she has guaranteed the obligations of friendly families.

34 million won will be provided. If money is not provided, the arms and legs of his/her married couple shall be well provided.

Dos bals

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, there was no victim's parent did not arrange for the above guarantee, and the above person's name was thought to use the phishing organization with money from the injured party.

On May 29, 2017, around 09:50, the victim withdrawn KRW 34 million from the Saemaeul Treasury located in the 5-dong, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and the defendant received the above KRW 34 million from the person who was damaged in front of the Sungdong-dong church located in the 11:40 on the same day.

As a result, the defendant was informed of the victim's property by deceiving the victim in collusion with the above person who was not aware of the name.

B. The victim I’s name in accordance with the above conspiracys with the victim I.

arrow