The instant lawsuit is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of the land B in the following cities in the following cities (hereinafter “instant land”).

On May 14, 2019, the Plaintiff filed an application for a survey of the boundary of the instant land with the Korean National Land Information Corporation (U.S.) and the YY branch on May 14, 2019. In the course of the survey, the difference between the size of the register (22m2m2) of the instant land and the size of the drawing (203.48m2m2) is 18.52m2m2 and the scope of the permissible error with respect to the area of the registry (hereinafter “public car”) shall be calculated by the following methods:

A (public car) = 0.0262M = F (M: cadastral map size m: size m, size m: size m.) is more than 12.09m2, and it was confirmed that it is a land subject to the fixed area (area).

B. The Plaintiff demanded the suspension of a survey as it appears that the boundary and the land boundary known by the principal are different during the course of surveying the restoration of boundaries, and revoked the application for surveying the restoration of the instant land on May 29, 2019.

(c)

On the other hand, on November 13, 2019 based on the above error, the Defendant entered the instant land register as “land subject to correction of registered matters” (hereinafter “instant disposition”) pursuant to Article 84 of the Act on the Establishment, Management, etc. of Space Information (hereinafter “Spatial Information Management”), Article 82 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, and Article 94 of the Enforcement Rule of the same Act, and notified the Plaintiff of the instant disposition on the following day.

[Ground for recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 5 and 6 (including various numbers if there are several numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Attached Form of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;

3. A lawsuit seeking revocation under the Administrative Litigation Act regarding the legality of the instant lawsuit ought to be instituted within 90 days from the date the Plaintiff became aware of the disposition (Article 20(1) of the Administrative Litigation Act). According to the records, the purport of the record is to allow the Plaintiff to survey the instant land on October 15, 2019, prior to the instant disposition, and to recover the Plaintiff’s land area.