1. On December 8, 2016, the Defendant’s decision of recommendation for the execution of the loan case against the Plaintiff is made.

1. As of December 8, 2016, this Court rendered a decision on performance recommendation with respect to the Defendant’s claim for loans to the Defendant’s Plaintiff (the Plaintiff shall pay to the Defendant an amount equivalent to 7.550,000 won and 15% interest from the day following the delivery of the complaint to the day of full payment) and the decision was served on the 13th day of that month and confirmed on the 28th day of that month.

The Plaintiff repaid its obligations as follows:

(2) On December 14, 2016, 14. 2. 2. 14 to October 2, 2018; 2. 3. 2. 30, 200,054 7,112,054; 807,69, 69; 7. 6. 50,000; 7. 6. 30,005 to 3. 2. 2. 15, 205 to 3. 4. 2. 4, 205 to 3. 3. 4, 205 to 4. 5, 206; 30. 50,000; 7. 6. 8. 4, 205 to 3. 6. 4, 206; 0. 50,000, 2435, 864, 2017

2. Although the defendant alleged that he was not reimbursed for the execution cost, the execution cost is that the defendant was reimbursed for the corporeal movables auction procedure.

In addition, the costs of lawsuit can not be asserted in this case unless they go through the final procedure of litigation.

Finally, although the plaintiff asserts that he was fully repaid with the knowledge that he was not liable, it is difficult to view that the plaintiff paid the principal and interest of the obligation even though he was aware that he was not liable.