A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 28, 2019, at around 06:45, the Defendant driven a dial car from around 9 km to the front of the original city B-distance, in a state of alcohol alcohol level of 0.203%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Consent to blood collection and written confirmation;

1. A written appraisal of blood alcohol;

1. Notification of the results of blood collection control (the results of blood collection) shall be applied to statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (3) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. In light of the fact that the statutory punishment for the drinking-driving crime has been continuously aggravated due to serious social harm caused by drinking-driving and changes in the legal sentiment of the general public, etc., the crime of drinking-driving is in need of strict punishment.

At the time of the defendant's drunk driving, blood alcohol concentration was very high to 0.203%.

The favorable circumstances: The defendant reflects the crime of this case.

There is no record that the defendant was punished for the same crime and the suspension of the execution of imprisonment.

Other circumstances, such as the age, character and conduct, the environment, the motive and background of the crime, the result of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., which are the conditions for the sentencing as shown in the arguments in this case, shall be determined as the sentence as