The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (fine 20 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following: (a) the defendant's mistake recognized the victim's mistake and reflects the depth of the traffic accident; (b) the victim was under the influence of alcohol to cross the road where the central separation cost was installed without permission; (c) the defendant's crime of this case is shocking the victim committed by the vehicle driven prior to the accident; (d) there are circumstances that may be considered in the circumstances of the accident; and (e) the defendant filed a report to the police immediately after the accident; and (e) the defendant's taxi driver joined the mutual aid association; (e) the result of the victim's death occurred; (e) the victim's death occurred due to the traffic accident of this case; (g) the victim's bereaved family members suffered a very large mental suffering; (g) the victim's bereaved family members agreed to pay a considerable amount of money; (g) the defendant did not reach an agreement with the victim's bereaved family members; and (g) the defendant did not actively endeavor to do so; and (g) the defendant's age, character, circumstances, means and consequence of the crime after the crime.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.