Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. On January 24, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 23:10 on the street in Gangdong-gu Seoul, Gangdong-gu, Seoul; (b) the victim C (the age of 37) who was a restaurant owner as an agent for the Defendant re-examines the Defendant as to whether the borrower was an acting engineer against the Defendant; (c) the victim’s face was fluored at one time with his/her hand.
2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act that cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. Since a written agreement indicating the victim’s intent not to be punished was submitted to this court on August 10, 2015, after the institution of the instant public prosecution, the instant public prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.