1. The Intervenor’s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are borne by the Intervenor joining the Defendant.

purport.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal or addition of the following contents among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance. Therefore, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420

(1) On the 5th page 11, " alone testimony of witness B" shall be understood as " alone with the testimony of witness B and the inquiry results of the court's fact-finding on the Board of Audit and Inspection".

(2) On the 5th page 12, the following shall be added to “no evidence”:

According to the results of the fact-finding by the Board of Audit and Inspection of this Court, C of the actual status of education allocation and execution against the Defendant joining the Defendant is confirmed as follows: “Around August 2011, the Board of Audit and Inspection notified only 10 persons who have access to the Gangseoland at least 10 times a day to the relevant university, and in the case of the Defendant joining the Defendant, only the Plaintiff shall be memoryd as the Plaintiff’s only.”

However, there is no evidence to prove that the Board of Audit and Inspection officially notified the Defendant Intervenor of the entry of the Plaintiff at least 10 times in Gangwonland, and it is difficult to recognize the fact that the Plaintiff had entered the Gangwon Islands at least 10 times a usual day.

[Attachment]

2. In conclusion, the Defendant’s Intervenor’s appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.