1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's acceptance intervenor, defendant D and E's acceptance intervenor.

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if each evidence submitted to the court of first instance is presented to the court of first instance, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is identical to that of the judgment of the first instance except for the addition of Paragraph 2, and therefore, it is acceptable to accept it according to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. On the second page of the judgment of the court of first instance, the addition shall add to the following:

D. On September 3, 2018, Defendant C’s acquiring intervenor purchased the land indicated in Paragraph 1 of the Attached List from Defendant C, the land indicated in Paragraph 2 of the Attached List from Defendant D on September 3, 2018, and the land indicated in Paragraph 3 of the Attached List from Defendant E on September 3, 2018, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on September 6, 2018, respectively.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the first instance, which dismissed the plaintiff's claim against the defendants, is just in conclusion, and therefore, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant C's acceptance intervenor, defendant D, and E is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.