logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2017.07.21 2016가합779
대여금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff asserts that, upon receiving a request from the Defendant to lend necessary funds in the process of granting permission for housing site development projects conducted in the South Africa, the Plaintiff loaned KRW 580 million to the Defendant from December 2017 to June 2008, and sought the return of KRW 580 million to the Defendant.

According to the statement in Gap evidence No. 1-7, it is recognized that the plaintiff remitted the total amount of KRW 100,000 on December 4, 2007, KRW 50,000 on May 30, 2008, KRW 200,000 on June 5, 2008, KRW 380,000,000 on June 10, 2008, KRW 380,000,000 on June 10, 200, KRW 100,000 on December 4, 2007, KRW 17, 2007, and KRW 200,000 on the D’s account.

However, there is not any evidence to acknowledge that the Plaintiff’s transfer of KRW 580 million, which the Plaintiff transferred to the Defendant as above by itself, was insufficient to acknowledge that the Plaintiff was the money lent to the Defendant, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Therefore, the plaintiff's ground of claim is without merit.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow