logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2020.07.09 2019가단149983
건물인도
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) Description 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 10, among the second floor of the building listed in the separate sheet;

Reasons

1. Indication of claim;

A. On June 22, 2007, the Plaintiff and B are the instant housing (hereinafter referred to as “instant housing”) indicated in paragraph (a) of the Disposition No. 1 of this case.

The term of lease deposit is 4,273,000 won, 103,90 won per month of rent, and 2 years of lease.

(B) The instant lease contract has been renewed every two years. (b) B died on February 1, 2015, and the Defendant and C, a child, inherited B. C. The Plaintiff informed the Defendant to conclude the instant lease contract by paying the increased deposit several times prior to the expiration date of the lease term ( August 31, 2015), and notified the Defendant that it will be treated as the expiration date of the lease term at the time of renewal. D. Nevertheless, the Defendant and C did not pay the increased deposit and did not enter into a contract for succession of rights and obligations, and thus, the instant lease contract was terminated upon expiration of the period of renewal. Although the instant lease contract was not terminated as a rejection of renewal, the Plaintiff was in arrears from September 1, 2015 to September 20, the instant lease contract was terminated by the delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case. At present, only the Defendant occupies the instant house, and only the Defendant is obliged to use the instant house at the rate of 10th to 30 days of delivery, as the heir of the instant lease contract.

arrow