logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.10.11 2019고단4802
전기통신사업법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No one may intermediate a third party's communications using telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator or provide such services for a third party's communications.

Nevertheless, the Defendant purchased and sold smartphone chips opened in the name of a foreigner and sold them in installments with the Defendant. The Defendant conspireded to take charge of the role of purchasing a core chips from D, which is the supply chips to receive money from the purchaser who reported and contacted the sales of the core chips, and selling the core chips from the Daejeon Complex Terminal, which is the supply chips, and sending the core chips to Seoul, and the Defendant received the core chips sent from the Gangnam-gu Bus Terminal to B and deliver them to the buyer as Kwikkset Services.

B, around March 16, 2019, transferred KRW 6.10,000 to the E Bank’s deposit account in the name-free chip purchaser, and around February 23, 2019, at the Daejeon Complex Terminal located in the Yongsandong-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, the four large core core chips, such as the core chips of the mobile phone “H” opened in the name of “G” from D, and purchased four large chips, such as the core chips of the mobile phone “H,” and sent them to the Seoul Gangseo-gu express bus terminal, and the Defendant received the core chips sent by B from the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City express bus terminal, and delivered them to Kwikset service.

In addition, from that time until April 5, 2019, the Defendant and B sold a total of nine chips entered in another person’s name, such as the attached list of crimes, from that time until April 5, 2019.

Accordingly, the defendant provided telecommunications services provided by telecommunications business operators in collusion with B for the purpose of telecommunications.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B;

1. The IJ of the place of prepaid advertising;

1. A copy of the contents of KS (L, B);

1. Prepaid oil depth transmission photographs, etc.;

1. The details of dialogue and dialogue related to prepaid chips, etc.;

arrow