1. The plaintiff's appeal and the conjunctive claim are all dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

1. The Plaintiff at the first instance court’s trial scope: (a) in relation to “construction works including CAutomatic Warehouse RACK,” the Plaintiff: (b) in relation to a claim for additional construction costs or a claim for restitution of unjust enrichment under an agreement on the portion of the additional construction works; and (c) in relation to “construction works including DAutomatic Warehouse,” a claim for restitution of additional construction costs or a claim for restitution of unjust enrichment under an agreement on the portion of the additional construction works (the Plaintiff already occurred or is anticipated to occur as of March 31, 2013 during the pertinent construction period; (d) the amount equivalent to KRW 19.5 million in the cost of additional equipment costs and personnel expenses; (e) the amount equivalent to KRW 18,275,000 in the name of additional personnel expenses incurred on July 2013 and August 2013; (e) the Plaintiff appears to have made a claim for restitution of unjust enrichment between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff or the Plaintiff’s claim for restitution of unjust enrichment on behalf of the Plaintiff for damages arising from industrial accidents.

The court of first instance dismissed all the Plaintiff’s claim. (1) The Plaintiff appealed only against the claim related to “19.5 million won in the name of equipment cost and personnel expenses incurred or anticipated to be incurred from March 2013, 2013,” among the claim for additional construction costs or the claim for return of unjust enrichment under an agreement on the portion of the additional construction related to “construction works for D automated warehouse RACK, etc.” (hereinafter “D automated warehouse RACK, etc.”).