A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2015. 3. 13. 19:05경 경주시 B에 있는 경주경찰서 C파출소 앞길에서, 위 파출소 소속 경사 D로부터 “112 신고자인 E 운영의 F에 재차 찾아가서 소란을 부리면 주거침입 등으로 입건될 수도 있으니 찾아가지 말라.”라는 취지의 요청을 듣자 이에 화가 나 “경찰관이 어디 그 따구로 하나, 시민을 정답게 해야지, 더 찍어라, 인물 좋으나, 아 새끼 진짜 이거, 쪼매는게 못땠네.” 등의 욕설을 하면서 위 D를 향해 침을 수회 뱉고 손으로 위 D의 목을 1회 때리는 등 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution [Scope of Recommendation] The sentence shall be determined as per the Disposition, taking into account the following factors: (a) no basic area (6-1-4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (6-1 year and 4 months); (b) there exists no record of being punished for the same crime (decision of sentence]; (c) police officers wanting to break their wife; and (d) all of the sentencing conditions stated in the records of the instant case.