logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구고등법원 2014.08.29 2014누169
산업재해보상보험급여액 징수처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff sought revocation of each disposition stated in the purport of the claim in the first instance court. The first instance court dismissed the Plaintiff’s claim for revocation of the disposition of collection of each industrial accident compensation insurance benefits as stated in the [Attachment 1, 2, 4, and 5], and dismissed the remainder of the Plaintiff’s claim.

As to this, the Plaintiff appealed only against the part against the disposition taken on November 22, 2011 (attached Table 3) (attached Table 3), the scope of the judgment of this court is limited to the part concerning the disposition taken on November 22, 201.

2. The reasoning for the court’s explanation as to this case is as follows: (a) the developments leading up to the disposition of Paragraph (1) and Paragraph (3) of this case among the judgments of the first instance; and (b) the part as to whether the disposition of this case is lawful. Therefore, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim seeking the revocation of the disposition in this case (3) is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow