All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant (one year and two months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible.

2. Prior to the instant crime, the Defendant was already punished four times as a crime of violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., and was sentenced by the Ulsan District Court on July 15, 201 to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. on July 15, 201 as the last punishment, and again committed the instant crime of the same kind during the repeated offense period even after the execution of the sentence was completed on April 2, 2012. However, even though it is deemed that the Defendant led to confession of the instant crime and reflects his mistake, and taking into account other various circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, which are the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the instant records and arguments, the sentence imposed by the lower court is too harsh.

It is not recognized that it is improper or unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since all of the appeal filed by the defendant