Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, for each of the defendants B.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A On November 16, 2012, the Daejeon District Court rendered a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of fraud in the support of the Daejeon District Court for the last six months, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 24, 2012.

Defendant

B On December 20, 2012, the Daejeon District Court was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for perjury for six months in the Daejeon District Court's astronomical Branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 28, 2012.

Defendant

A In the judgment of the Daejeon District Court in the fraud case No. 2012 High-Ma858, the defendant was tried to be the defendant, and there was no criminal intent to commit fraud." The defendant B failed to perform his/her obligation to the victim of the fraud case due to unavoidable circumstances because it was impossible to collect his/her claim against the defendant B, and the defendant B failed to perform his/her obligation to the victim at any time, with the mind that he/she had the ability to perform his/her obligation to the victim at any time. The defendant B prepared a false loan certificate with the defendant B and submitted it to the full bench.

1. Defendants’ criminal conduct

A. On August 13, 2012, the Defendants drafted a loan certificate as of August 11, 2005, stating that “B shall borrow KRW 40 million in cash from August 11, 2005 to creditors A and promise to repay until August 11, 2007,” and written a loan certificate as of August 11, 2005, stating that “The Defendants shall have a debt worth KRW 30 million with the repayment of KRW 10 million on August 11, 2009.”

However, there was no fact that Defendant A lent KRW 40 million to Defendant B, and there was no fact that Defendant A was repaid KRW 10 million among them.

On August 14, 2012, the Defendants presented three copies of the above loan certificates to K in charge of authentication-at-law in charge of authentication-at-law in the F law firm G that they may know of the facts in the F law firm, and have the creditors A lend 30 million won to the obligor B.