The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) that the court below sentenced the defendant (one million won penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. In light of no change in circumstances that may be considered in sentencing after the judgment of the court below, and the various conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, even if the defendant asserts on grounds of appeal, considering the circumstances alleged by the defendant, the sentence of the court below is too unlimited and unfair (it does not seem unfair since the defendant alleged the facts on the grounds of appeal on May 10, 2017 at the first trial date of the appellate court on May 10, 2017, but it cannot be a legitimate ground for appeal as it was raised after the deadline for submitting the appeal. However, this cannot be a legitimate ground for appeal as it was raised after the lapse of the deadline for submitting the appeal, and there is no reason to ex officio review the defendant's appeal.