The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal in this case was already opened before the confirmation of the defendant, and there was no opening of the defendant.

2. The judgment below is based on the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, i.e., the defendant continued to reside before the complainant acquired ownership, and the mail box appears to have been practically controlled by the defendant. ② Under such circumstances, the defendant submitted the contents of the mail as evidence of a named action against the defendant by the complainant, ③ naturally opened the mail sent by the public office or sent by a third party after arbitrarily opening the mail, and then again opening it is difficult in light of the empirical rule, it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant opened the mail with a notice of property tax payment sent to the victim as stated in the judgment of the court below. The defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.