1. The defendant on May 9, 1996 to the plaintiffs as to each real estate listed in the separate sheet of Suwon District Court.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On December 16, 1910, F, which had a domicile in Suwon-gun E, written in the Forest Survey Division in the Japanese colonial era, stated that on December 16, 1910, the said G forest land of the same G (300 square meters, hereinafter referred to as “land before subdivision”).

B. On April 1, 1967, the land before subdivision was partitioned into 150 square meters of H forests and 150 square meters of I road, and the divided H land was subdivided into 413 square meters of H forests and 413 square meters of J forest and 83 square meters of J forest on January 27, 1986, and the land after the second subdivision was subdivided into each land listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each land of this case”). Each ownership preservation registration (hereinafter “instant preservation registration”) was completed in the Defendant’s name as to each land of this case as indicated in the separate sheet.

C. The Plaintiff’s prior owner of F had his permanent domicile in Suwon-gun K, died on 1918 (seven years in 1918), and L was born on February 23, 1962, and L was born on February 23, 1962, and Plaintiff D et al., a wife M, children, N,O, and P (open name) succeeded to inheritance or substitute inheritance. The Plaintiff died on January 8, 199 and succeeded to R, Plaintiff A, B, and C’s registry.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 and 2 evidence, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. (1) The determination of the cause of the claim is based on the above facts. In light of the following: F, the Plaintiff’s fleet, and F, the name and domicile of Han-gun E, the assessment titleholder of the land before division, coincide with F, the assessment titleholder of the land before division, and there is no other evidence to deem F, the assessment titleholder of the land before division, and F, the assessment titleholder of the land before division, shall be deemed the same person.

(2) Therefore, as long as it is revealed that F, the Defendant’s prior purchaser, had acquired the ownership of each of the instant lands divided from the land prior to the division, the presumption of the preservation registration of each of the instant lands is possible.