logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.05.01 2011가합463
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiffs' approval of the housing construction project plan 1) The non-party corporation's green construction (hereinafter referred to as "green construction")

) On April 25, 2001, the Defendant market approved the project of constructing a rental apartment with 360 households of the Green 1 complex on the land outside the 13th, Ulsan-dong, Ulsan-dong, Incheon-do, and three parcels, and on August 17, 2001, approved the project of constructing a rental apartment with 3 complexes of 298 households of the same apartment complex at the same 298 unit on the land above the 20-7th, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do. The Plaintiff, Seoul-dong Development (hereinafter “Plaintiff-nam Development”)

) On April 25, 2001, the Defendant market approved the project to build rental apartments with 357 households of such green town 2 complex on the land of 20-7 in the same mountain village from the same market. On December 19, 2001, the head of Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, the head of the Gu from Ulsan-gu, the head of the Gu from Ulsan-gu, Seoul, about December 19, 2001, 260 households of the same apartment complex on the above land (hereinafter referred to as the “instant apartment complex”).

A) A project for constructing a rental apartment is approved. The approval of each housing construction project plan is subject to the following conditions (hereinafter referred to as “instant approval conditions”):

On January 11, 2002, the North-gu Office approved the change of the project proprietor from the construction to the Plaintiff’s water supply construction to the part that is anticipated to cause traffic congestion, such as the road on which an access road (B=20m) and the road adjoining to a Do. On January 27, 2002, it is wind to complete the construction of infrastructure necessary for multi-family housing (entry roads, water supply and sewerage systems) (3), 19(13). After completion of the construction of infrastructure necessary for multi-family housing (entry roads, water supply and sewerage systems) until the pre-use inspection of multi-family housing (3,4) until the pre-use inspection of multi-family housing.

3. The Plaintiffs continued to conduct the above business.

arrow