The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

On March 10, 2017, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant at around 22:00, in front of the C restaurant located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and the Defendant interfered with the lawful performance of duties by the police officer on public safety and maintenance of order by assaulting the Defendant, i.e., the police officer E, who belongs to the police station D police box, sent out upon receipt of a report, in order to have the Defendant returned home to the Defendant, who was taken by the police officer E of the police station D police box, and then throw away the Defendant, and then spaw off the Defendant.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 of the same Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

1. Penalty fine of KRW 3,000,000 to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (the crime of obstructing the performance of official duties requires strict punishment as a crime prejudicial to the function of the State by nullifying the legitimate exercise of public authority, on the other hand, the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects in depth, and has no record of crime. The crime of this case is due to circumstances in light of the circumstance that the defendant’s child’s child’s child’s words being divorced, and her child’s child’s child’s child’s child’s child’s child’s drinking alcohol exceeding the main amount in a prompt and contingent manner, and the degree of assault is not serious, and the victim’s police officer does not want the punishment of the defendant).