1. The defendant, on July 29, 2009, filed with the plaintiff with respect to the 2,238 square meters of the paddy-gun, Jeonnam-gun Co., Ltd. for the plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. As to the land of this case (hereinafter “instant land”), the title transfer registration under the name of the defendant was made on January 21, 2009, the title transfer registration was made on July 29, 2009, the title transfer registration was made on July 2668, 2009, as the title No. 1038, the title transfer registration was made on January 23, 2009, with respect to the land of this case, the title transfer registration was made on July 27, 2009, the title transfer registration was made on July 27, 2009.

B. On September 27, 2018, the Plaintiff sent a content-certified mail to the Defendant to complete the registration of ownership transfer of the instant land by October 7, 2018 on the ground that the right to complete the reservation based on the provisional registration was exercised against the Defendant, and thereafter, sent it to the Defendant around that time.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 4 and 7-1, and the purport of whole pleading

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts, the Defendant is obligated to implement the registration procedure for transfer of ownership on October 7, 2018 with respect to the instant land based on the registration of the provisional ownership transfer right claim to the Plaintiff.

B. As to this, the Defendant: (a) held the title trust of the instant land to the Defendant; (b) completed the registration of the right to claim ownership transfer registration in order to secure the Plaintiff’s right to claim ownership transfer registration against the Defendant; and (c) agreed to complete the principal registration upon the Plaintiff’s request; (b) the said agreement is null and void under the premise of a title trust agreement null and void under the Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder’s Name; and (c) the said provisional registration is also null and void; (d) there is no evidence to prove that the Plaintiff held the title trust of the instant land to the Defendant; and (e) rather, in full view of the respective entries and arguments stated in subparagraphs A through 7 (including additional numbers) and the purport of the entire pleadings, three of the sum of the purchase price, brokerage