1. The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff the real estate stated in the attached list.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3...

1. In light of the overall purport of the pleadings as to the cause of the claim Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including virtual numbers), the plaintiff is a housing redevelopment and rearrangement project association established to implement a housing redevelopment and improvement project under the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter "Urban Improvement Act"), the plaintiff has obtained authorization from the head of Seongdong-gu Office on November 16, 2007, the authorization for establishment of the association on January 12, 2017, respectively, and has received authorization for the implementation of the management and disposal plan on July 6, 2018, and announced it around that time. The defendant is the owner of the real estate listed in the attached list in the plaintiff's business area (hereinafter "the real estate of this case"). On May 31, 2019, the local Land Tribunal's ruling on the above real estate was made on July 19, 2019 (hereinafter "the date of expropriation").

Article 81 (1) of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas provides that the owner, superficies, leaseer, etc. of the previous land or building shall not use the previous land or building or benefit therefrom by the date of the public announcement of the approval of the management and disposal plan under Article 78 (4).

According to the above facts, the defendant has a duty to deliver the above real estate to the plaintiff, since he lost the right to use and benefit from the real estate in accordance with the plaintiff's management and disposal plan notice

2. The defendant's assertion is alleged to the effect that the defendant raised an objection because the amount of adjudication on the real estate of this case undersatisfy and the plaintiff cannot respond to the plaintiff's claim because he is in preparation for the confirmation of nullity of the establishment of the association against the plaintiff union. However, the circumstance alleged by the defendant is merely a content that must be contested through administrative litigation, and it cannot be deemed a justifiable reason that