A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 04:00 on August 23, 2013, the Defendant saw an alcohol disease on the front of D in the Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, and got a walk from the victim E (the age of 56) who was in operation of mad taxi, and seeed the horses to fright the way from the victim E (the age of 56) who was in operation of the mad taxi, and kiddd the victim's face through open windows with the taxi driver's seat, making the erobbb, making the victim's face fat, making it possible for the victim's face fat, and taking the fat, which is a dangerous object from the floor, by gathering the fat fat, which is the one dangerous from the taxi on the floor, and caused the victim's injury, such as open fat, etc., in need of two-day medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on standing photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on probation, community service order, and order to attend a lecture under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act alleged that the defendant was in a state of mental disorder at the time of committing the crime. Thus, it cannot be viewed that the defendant was in a state of weak ability or decision-making ability to discern things due to drinking at the time of committing the crime of this case in light of the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, the degree of drinking, and the circumstances after committing the crime of this case. Thus, the above assertion is rejected.

The reason for sentencing [decision of the type] is the reason for habitual injury, repeated injury, and special injury, repeated crime, and special injury (special offender] of habitual injury, repeated injury, and special injury (special offender) [the range of punishment to be mitigated] mitigation area, the range of punishment to be mitigated (the decision of recommendation area and recommendation range] reduction area, the same sentence that is not the same as a repeated offender (general person) from June to June of 1 year and six months (general person) and termination of enforcement.