logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.12.13 2017노3277
횡령
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, including the summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts), the facts charged in this case are fully recognized (the defendant - denied the facts charged in this case by asserting that the "7.26% of the waste rate of the snivee of the snivee of the snivee of this case listed in the General List" was erroneous, but the defendant's statement at the prosecutor's office with respect to the snivee of the defendant is not consistent, i.e., the following circumstances known by the above evidence, i., the defendant's statement at the prosecutor's office with respect to the snivee of the defendant, ii) the defendant's statement to the effect that G and H together with the defendant's above argument are consistent with the defendant's statement, but it is difficult to easily believe that the actual waste rate is inconsistent with all the statement about the snivee of this case's snivee of the fact that it was difficult to find the defendant guilty of the above portion of loss.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant received a total of 1.9 billion won from the victim company from January 19, 2012 to April 9, 2012, and purchased approximately 250,000 mank-type snives of snives of snives of 1.5 billion won among them, and the Defendant purchased approximately 250,000 manives of snives of snives of snives of snives of snives of snives of 1.5 million won from the victim company.

arrow