beta
Text
Defendant
A 4 years of imprisonment, 4 years of imprisonment for Defendant C, 3 years of imprisonment for Defendant D, and 1 year of imprisonment for Defendant B.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant A, Defendant B, who operated “K” as a transportation company at Pyeongtaek-siJ, and Defendant B, who was engaged in the door-to-door distribution business, was aware of the work in the distribution industry.
1. Defendant A, after acquiring L with C and D, conspired with Defendant A to procure money for the purchase cost of the land entering into the zone by recruiting the land borrower.
Accordingly, Defendant A posted the advertisement for soliciting local buyers and explained the contents of the business to customers who found the advertisement, C entered into a contract with customers, and D received and managed the purchase cost of the local car, respectively.
Defendant
A acquires L from a person in the name of the end of July 2016 due to transfer of L from the person in the name of the end of the life, and up to the “intersection newspaper” on the “intersection newspaper,” the advertisement “Is the U.S. military unit’s work room, 5 tons, 11 tons, salary 50 to 650”. On August 5, 2016, A reported the above advertisement at the above L office located in Pyeongtaek-si M and used the name “O” to the victim N., and “Korean Company is a partnership of Hanjin-jin who entered into a freight transport service contract with the U.S. military unit.”
If the freight is paid in KRW 130,000,000,000 for the freight, it will purchase and enter the freight vehicle and employ it as an engineer to transport the freight to the military unit.
The monthly salary will be 6.5 million won.
“P.” The C used the provisional name of “P.” and provided the victim’s account in the middle and high cargo vehicle trading company in the old and in the middle and high cargo vehicle trading company, and D provided the said down payment, etc. with its account.
However, L Co., Ltd. did not have entered into a cargo transport service with Hanjin Co., Ltd., and Defendant A thought that it will receive the cargo rent from the injured party and use it for the repayment of its obligation, so even if it receives money from the injured party, it is employed as the borrower.