1. The Defendant’s execution of the construction cost case against the Plaintiff by Seoul Southern District Court on January 4, 2018.

A. The Plaintiff’s right to request direct payment of the construction cost is determined as to whether the Defendant had the right to request direct payment of the construction cost and, accordingly, if the Defendant paid the price to A, whether the Plaintiff was unaware of who is the legitimate obligee.

(B) If the Plaintiff is obliged to pay the price for the disposal of waste soil and sand to A, the deposit of the Plaintiff is not effective as it does not meet the requirements). The main issue of the instant case is the former, which is the issue whether the Plaintiff and the Defendant should bear the cost of the disposal of waste soil and sand.

3. The fact of recognition ① The Plaintiff subcontracted the incidental civil engineering works among the main complex construction works implemented in the Dong-dong B, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si on March 13, 2017 to the Defendant at KRW 120,100,000 (including value-added tax).

[Matters] The scope of construction works under Paragraph (2) of the same Article: Electric field, water, asphalt (except for oil), ready-mixed, boundary stone, irrigation room, irrigation room, irrigation room (me, fume, * shape side room, sideway, water supply room, collection revision), connection pipe, man (including fume lid), various news block, sand, cement, cement, miscellaneous, and dour. Upon receipt of a request for payment of subcontract price (wages, material cost, equipment cost, etc.) from the defendant, the plaintiff may give instructions necessary for the subcontract price to the defendant, and if the plaintiff pays the subcontract price to the defendant in cash, the defendant may immediately pay the price to the plaintiff, and submit the evidence to the plaintiff. If the defendant fails to comply therewith, or is likely to delay or delay the price, the amount of the subcontract price may be paid directly after deducting the corresponding amount of the subcontract price from the subcontract price or the price to be paid in the future.

When concluding a contract with the plaintiff, the defendant agrees to the direct payment of the subcontract price to the working participant of the relevant construction project.

It is not included in the details of construction cost to be submitted by the defendant under paragraph 10, or the specifications are different.