logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.03.30 2018고단366
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 7, 2010, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a fine for a crime of violating road traffic law in the Gwangju District Court's Netcheon Branch, and on October 1, 2014, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 2 million as a fine for the same crime.

1. On January 29, 2017, the Defendant: (a) violated the Road Traffic Act; (b) and (c) violated the Road Traffic Act (a) driving without a license; (b) on January 29, 2017, the Defendant driven Cone Star Sheet in the state of under the influence of alcohol of about 0.095% of alcohol content among blood alcohol while under the influence of alcohol on the roads near the Hobol apartment located in the Suncheon-si-dong of the relevant city at KRW 1:10 to the front of the same city.

As a result, the Defendant violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice and driven a motor vehicle without a driver's license while driving the motor vehicle while drunk.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car with Cone Star Co., Ltd. in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Risk Driving).

On January 29, 2017, the Defendant had a duty of care to safely drive the front apartment road of the 2nd apartment road located in the Yacheon-si, Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si, in the front of the 3rd apartment road, from the gym of the gym of the municipal ordinance, at night, and other vehicles were stopping in the front door of the Defendant, and in such cases, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving of the vehicle, had a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle by checking the front door and the left door of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, as provided in paragraph 1, the Defendant is unable to walk properly while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.095%, and without examining the right and the right by driving while under the influence of recognition ability, and by negligence going through without examining the Defendant’s right and the right and the right of the signal at the front of the signal in the Defendant’s air, and the part behind the Defendant’s driving Ei30 vehicle behind the Defendant’s driving of the victim D (W, 31 years old) where he was under the influence of the signal in the front of the traffic.

arrow