The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the substance of the grounds for appeal in this case, the sentence imposed by the court below (two months of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant assisted the Defendant to commit the instant game room business by referring to the term “breath president,” and there are extenuating circumstances such as aiding and abetting the Defendant to commit the instant game room business. However, the lower court appears to have determined the Defendant’s punishment by taking account of equity with the case where each of the instant crimes and the first head’s judgment, which became final and conclusive pursuant to Article 39(1) of the Criminal Act, concurrently ruled that the Defendant violated the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry of the first head, which became final and conclusive pursuant to Article 39(1) of the Criminal Act, at the same time, there is no special change of circumstances that may change the above punishment. The Defendant is not only at the time when he received monetary compensation from the actual owner of the instant game room, and even during the first investigation process, not only at the time when he made a false statement as if he actually engaged in the instant business, but also at the time when he received monetary reward from the actual owner of the instant game room, but also at the time when he received punishment for the instant crime, such as committing an unlawful game room’s crime, which does not interfere with the Defendant’s criminal intent.