A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 2017, the Defendant became aware of the Victim B (V, 19 years of age) through hosting display.

1. On December 26, 2017, the Defendant: (a) stated, around December 26, 2017, that “ATM instrument of the D Association in Bupyeong-si, Gyeonggi-do referred to as “ATM instrument of the D Association in Bupyeong-si, Gyeonggi-do would be threatened if it was aware that it was written with a large amount of lending money; (b) would be able to lend money; and (c) would be able to decide whether to fully pay the principal and interest of the loan if it was lent money.”

However, the defendant did not have a certain occupation at the time, and there was no intention or ability to repay the debt of the victim on behalf of the victim, even if the victim borrowed the loan to the defendant, because the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the debt of the victim in lieu of the victim's loan.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received a letter from the victim to deliver a e.g., a e., a e., 5 million won card that the victim borrowed from the E bank, to withdraw 500,000 won, and received a delivery of 4.5 million won in cash.

2. On December 28, 2017, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant, on December 28, 2017, at a G agency located in Seocheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, that “the installment and charge of the device shall be paid in full and shall be changed by opening the cell phone in four names.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have a certain occupation but had a debt of about five million won, and he thought that he sold the mobile phone after opening the mobile phone in the name of the victim. Therefore, the victim did not have an intention or ability to pay the installment and the fee even if he opened the mobile phone.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was issued three mobile phone calls of the amount of KRW 4.8 million at the market price on the same day by the victim.

3. The criminal defendant who committed fraud on January 12, 2018 is guilty.