1. The Defendant’s KRW 113,057,261 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from October 27, 2013 to May 19, 2017.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. At around 18:00 on October 27, 2013, B: (a) Category C Cargo Vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant Vehicle”)

2) On the other hand, the Defendant’s bicycle front of the utility pole No. 152 between Samsan-ri, Incheon, Samsan-ri, Tri-ri, Tri-ri, Tri-ri, Tri-ri, Tri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri.

2) The Plaintiff suffered injury, such as Dam cage cages and dysages, due to the instant accident.

3) The defendant is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the defendant vehicle. The defendant is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive automobile insurance contract. The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, Gap evidence 1 through 4, Eul evidence 1-3 through 13, Eul evidence 2-1 to 2-4, the purport of the whole pleadings.

B. According to the fact of recognition of liability, the Plaintiff was injured due to the operation of the Defendant’s vehicle, and the Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages incurred as the insurer of the Defendant’s vehicle, barring any special circumstance.

C. The limitation of liability is limited, however, in the event that the instant accident is located on the side of the road where the irrigation channel is located and the shock balance is lost due to an accident while getting on and driving a bicycle according to the edge of the road, the Plaintiff was highly likely to fall, even though he did not go on the front side of the road, and he was driven along the road by getting on and getting on a bicycle and getting on a central line over the road without driving on the front side of the road.