Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months, by a fine of 5,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A provides 40 games in the "D Gameland in Ansan City" and operates a youth game room, and the defendant B is an employee of the above game room.

No one shall engage in the business of exchanging or arranging the exchange or repurchase of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

Nevertheless, the Defendants, from May 8, 2017 to May 15 of the same month, worked in the said D Gameland as Defendant A, and Defendant B, at night, worked in the said D Gameland, and at night. If customers request money exchange after they performed the game to the said game machine, they exchanged in cash the amount calculated by deducting 10% from the points acquired through the game as commission.

As a result, Defendants conspired to exchange tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game products for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness F;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning the F;

1. Colors of a money exchange terminal by closure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (No. 5 No. 5 of the evidence list);

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Articles 44(1)2 and 32(1)7 of the Game Industry Promotion Act; Article 30 of the Criminal Act; the choice of imprisonment

B. Defendant B: Article 44(1)2 and Article 32(1)7 of the Game Industry Promotion Act; Article 30 of the Criminal Act; Selection of fines

1. Defendant B of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A who is under a suspended sentence: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as the following favorable circumstances):

1. Defendant A of a community service order: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Article 44 (2) of the Promotion of respective Game Industry Act;

1. Defendant B: The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is the social harm of the crime of this case and the fact that the Defendants did not recognize the mistake, although the liability for the crime is not easy, the period of operation of the game room does not change.