1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A, B, C, and D are listed in Appendix 1 List No. 1.

1. In light of the following facts, the evidence Nos. 4-2, 6-2, 7, and 8 of Defendant F, G, and H part A’s evidence Nos. 4-2, 6-7, and 8, it is difficult to deem that road works have been implemented without compensation, the Plaintiff acquired ownership through consultation on the O of the window window at Changwon-si, and was incorporated into P Highway. Thus, barring any special circumstance, the Defendants are liable to implement the procedure for ownership transfer registration of the said land according to the inheritance shares to the Plaintiff.

(The plaintiff opened a P Expressway on the land above, and 20 years have passed since it was offered to the public use, so the acquisition by prescription has also been completed). Accordingly, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is to accept it.

2. Judgment by public notice (as to Defendant E and K:

(a) Indication of claims: as shown in the annex of claims;

B. Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act

3. Judgment without holding any pleadings (other Defendants than Defendant F, G, H, E, and K)

(a) Indication of claims: as shown in the annex of claims;

B. Article 208(3)1 of the Civil Procedure Act provides that “H 7/336 (2/12/12 x 1/4 x 7/7/7)” in attached Table 2(2) of the Addenda 208(3)1 is obvious that “I is a clerical error in I 7/336 (2/12/12 x 1/4 x 7/7/7).”

5. Litigation costs shall be borne by each party, taking into account all circumstances, such as circumstances in which the plaintiff has not completed the registration of ownership transfer.