Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a C-si.

On November 29, 2014, the Defendant driven the above taxi on November 29, 2015:05:25, and moved the distance of 54 North Am-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul to the direction of the direction of the north Amopon distance from the north Amho apartment room in the north Amho-dong, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul.

Since a pedestrian crossing has a signal apparatus installed, if a pedestrian passes the pedestrian crossing, he/she shall stop temporarily in front of the pedestrian crossing and neglect his/her duty of care to protect the pedestrian, while neglecting his/her duty of care to protect the pedestrian, and thereby, the driver of the pedestrian crossing in the right side of the defendant's proceeding by discovering the victim D (if he/she is 78 years of age) to the left side of the road in accordance with the pedestrian signals of the pedestrian on the right side of the defendant's proceeding, but he/she was faced with the victim by the front part of the defendant's vehicle and caused the victim to go beyond the pedestrian crossing.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from an injury to the victim under the pressure frame No. 2, which requires approximately three months of treatment (12 weeks) due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement related to a traffic accident prepared D;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Special Cases concerning the Selection of Punishment for Facts constituting an offense, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act (Selection of Depository Punishment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. In the event of traffic accidents due to the defendant's violation of signalling reasons in sentencing Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, the degree of injury of the victim is significant and the defendant's liability for the crime is not easy, the defendant's mistake is divided and reflected, the defendant is admitted to the taxi mutual aid association, the defendant has no record of criminal punishment other than the previous offense of the fine, and other various sentencing conditions specified in the arguments of this case are considered.