logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.01.29 2014고단1573
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. On October 6, 2013, the Defendant: (a) had been aware of the following facts: (b) had been engaged in an fluoral activity, such as the victim C (the age of 56); (c) had been engaged in a dispute with the victim’s office located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government DD Building 202 on the ground that the victim’s drinking and drinking are not in mind; and (d) had been engaged in a dispute with the victim on the ground that the victim’s drinking and drinking are not in mind, at the victim’s office located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government DD Building 202 on the same day, the Defendant had a part of the victim’s left side buckbuck paper, which is about 10cc in total length, about 3cc in knife length, and had a part of the victim’s fluoral with the victim’s fluoral k and the heart in need of treatment

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

2. The defendant's change of the defendant did not have a knife part of the victim's left knife knife with mountain knife as stated in the above facts charged at the time of the case.

Rather, when the defendant had a knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife with the knife knife, and the knife kn

3. Determination

A. Criminal facts in a criminal trial should be established based on strict evidence with probative value, which leads a judge to confluence of a reasonable doubt. Therefore, in a case where the prosecutor’s proof does not sufficiently reach the extent that the defendant’s assertion or defense is inconsistent or unreasonable, there is suspicion of guilt, such as where the defendant’s assertion or defense is inconsistent or unreasonable.

Even if the interests of the defendant should be judged.

(Supreme Court Decision 2008Do8137 Decided January 5, 2009, etc.)

B. Such a legal doctrine.

arrow