logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.05.31 2017고단1198 (1)
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall lend any medium access to electronic financial transactions while receiving, demanding or promising the payment.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, on October 2016, borrowed the check card connected to the account of the head of the Tong, is used for 15 days and 1.5 million won as the fee for the use of the check card. However, the Defendant, on the basis of the name and the name and the name and the name of the head of the “B” corporation “B” corporation, is an import liquor corporation, and there is too much amount of tax reduction and exemption.

In response to the proposal, around 15:00 on October 5, 2016, the Ministry of Strategy and Finance sent a e-mail card, which is a access medium connected to the Defendant’s name bank account (E) via a door-to-door engineer, and the password sent a medium of access to electronic financial transactions to the name in a way that the telephone is known.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation, such as a petition, a certificate of confirmation of request for deposit, three copies of output and photographs, and each internal investigation report;

1. Article 49 of the Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 49 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions through which punishment is selected (excluding punishment); Article 6 (3) 2 of the same Act (excluding punishment);

1. The defendant's responsibility is not exceptionally imposed in light of the reason for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with respect to the crime of this case, resulting in the actual occurrence of the occurrence of the damage from the licensing.

However, the degree of the crime of this case is not severe and the defendant was unable to obtain any benefits from the crime of this case, the defendant is currently divided into his own mistake, the defendant has no record of crime so far, the defendant has no record of crime, and the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, etc. are determined as ordered by taking into account various sentencing conditions shown in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means

arrow