A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 3, 2015, around 17:30, the Defendant laid away cigarette butts on the floor while she was spiting to C while working in front of the traffic control in the Daegu Seo-gu Police Station B District of the Daegu Seo-gu Police Station where the traffic control was on the front of the “Nonsan Elementary School” located in 202, Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Seoul, and D, while working for the traffic control, and she was spiting off the taxi on the floor. The Defendant spited the cigarette butts on the floor. The Defendant she spited the boom, and she recommended D to return home, using the cell phone rash.

Since then, the defendant had been able to take the cell phone device by hand while the above D was "Isman," it was time for the defendant to take the face of D one time with a slick, because he was unable to take the cell phone device by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on traffic control and prevention of traffic hazards.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. In light of the following: (a) the Defendant’s reason for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, even though he/she had been punished for a secondary violent crime, committed the instant crime, and again committed an assaulting a police officer in the course of performing official duties again; (b) the Defendant has no record of criminal punishment for an obstruction of performance of official duties; (c) the Defendant has no record of assaulting; (d) the degree of assault is relatively minor; (e) the Defendant led to the confession of and is in depth against the Defendant; and (e) other all other circumstances constituting