1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a medical corporation that operates the J Hospital at Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City I (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), and the network K (hereinafter “the deceased”) was hospitalized in the right sleep surgery at the Defendant Hospital. The Plaintiff A’s spouse, and the rest of the Plaintiffs are the deceased’s heirs as the deceased’s children.

B. The Deceased was in the age of 82, who had been in 15 years before 15 years of age, and had been in the workplace cancer surgery before 1 year, and was in the Defendant Hospital with Plaintiff D, who was in son on August 31, 2012, to undergo an artificial abortion operation in a state with severe pain pains on both sides.

The Defendant Hospital diagnosed the symptoms of the deceased as “satisfying satchitis” and explained both slots on the satfy operation.

C. On September 6, 2012, after receiving counseling from L, the Deceased and Plaintiff D determined to undergo a diplomatic mission slicking operation on the right slicking (hereinafter “instant operation”), and the left slicking on September 13, 2012 to undergo an operation, except in extenuating circumstances.

At the time, the medical team of the Defendant Hospital conducted blood examination, scarcity radio and scarcity test on the Deceased, and as a result, the result, it judged that it was possible to correct it by blood transfusion 9.8. However, as a result of the scarcity photographs, the Defendant Hospital judged that it was possible to correct it by blood transfusion 9.8. However, even though it was doubtful as a result of the scarcity radio, the scarcity was suspected of having shown a scarcity, but it was not a significant obstacle to alcohol due to the scarcity of the scarcity. As a result of the scarcity radio wave, it was determined that the scarcity was not a heart due to the scarcity of the scarcity, and that there was no other abnormal opinion, and thus, the operation risk was determined to be “serious or low.”

On the same day, the Deceased and the Plaintiff D prepared and returned to the Defendant Hospital the consent form of the instant water alcohol, the consent form of the special surgery, the consent form of the blood transfusion, and the consent form of the anesthesia.