logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2021.01.13 2020가단2267
추심금
Text

1. Each of the plaintiffs' claims is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against the Intervenor joining the Defendant with this Court Decision 2019 Ghana 87815, and on August 29, 2019, the judgment that “The Defendant Intervenor paid to each of the Plaintiffs 30,000,000 won and 24% interest per annum from March 16, 2016 to the date of full payment” (hereinafter “instant judgment”) was rendered and confirmed.

B. According to the instant judgment on November 18, 2019, the Plaintiffs seized the claims indicated in the separate sheet against the Defendant (Defendant) by “56,117,260 won in claim amount and the third obligor (Defendant Intervenor) of the obligor (Defendant Intervenor)” under 10046, i.e., 2019.

The above seized claims can be collected by the plaintiffs, who are creditors.

“A collection order was issued with the content of the seizure and collection order (hereinafter “instant seizure and collection order”).

The instant order of seizure and collection was served on November 22, 2019 on the Defendant.

[Ground for recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The “E private teaching institute” registered under the name of the Defendant’s assertion by the Plaintiffs is a private teaching institute substantially operated by the Defendant’s Intervenor. The Defendant is merely an employee of the Defendant’s assistant participant, and the name of the business operator was replaced by the Defendant’s assistant participant.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Defendant’s assistant to the Defendant’s educational institute revenues, and the Plaintiffs received the instant seizure and collection order against the Defendant’s assistant intervenor’s claim against the Defendant. Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiffs the money stated in the purport of the claim.

3. On the basis of the judgment, the evidence submitted by the plaintiffs and evidence No. 3 and the evidence No. 1 of this Court, and each of the orders to submit documents to F Co., Ltd., G Co., Ltd., H Co., Ltd., I Co., Ltd., I Co., Ltd., and J Co., Ltd.

arrow