logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.06.13 2017고단446
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Non-measures after Accidents) is a person who is engaged in driving of CKaman-si Motor Vehicle, and the Defendant, around 00:40 on January 26, 2017, took place after the first half of CKaman-ro gate on the roads front of the E convenience store located in J in Seojin-jin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seojin-gu.

In this case, a person engaged in driving service of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to take the front, rear, left and left well, and to accurately operate steering and brakes.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of being negligent in driving a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant got off the top left part of the G Track vehicle owned by the victim F in front of the passenger vehicle operated by the Defendant, and continued to be parked on the right part of the passenger vehicle in front of the victim H, the victim H, who was parked on the right part of the passenger vehicle in front of the passenger vehicle driven by the Defendant, destroyed that the amount of 65,200 won per repair cost would be 65,200 won, and that the K 7 passenger vehicle would be destroyed to be 1,198,000 won per repair cost and run away without taking necessary measures.

2. On January 26, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of the measurement of drinking), was driven under the influence of alcohol, such as a slope L belonging to the relevant police box, a face of the Defendant, red, and a walked from M while under the influence of alcohol, at the K police box located in the J of Seo-jin-gu in the Jeon-gu in the Jeondong-gu in the Jeondong-gu.

There is a reasonable reason to determine a person, and it was demanded to respond to the measurement of drinking by inserting approximately three times the whole in a drinking measuring instrument.

Nevertheless, without justifiable grounds, the Defendant did not put the part of a drinking measuring instrument into a drinking measuring instrument, and avoided this, and failed to comply with a police officer’s request for a drinking test without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on the circumstances of the driver's license in the State;

arrow