The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below has a favorable condition to the defendant, such as recognizing the defendant's mistake and reflecting it. However, each of the crimes of this case is deemed unfair since the defendant employed a foreign woman without the status of sojourn while operating a massage place without the qualification of a massage club, and, in collusion with a foreign local hub, etc., mediates employment of the foreign women without the status of sojourn as a business. In light of the method, period, frequency, etc. of the crime, the crime is very poor; the defendant continues to commit the crime without being aware of the criminal punishment even though he was sentenced to criminal punishment for the same crime; and all of the sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, method, frequency, period, period, and size of the crime, circumstances after the crime, degree of participation in the crime, and equity in punishment among accomplices, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.