1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On November 24, 1998, the Plaintiff was admitted to the 7th Supplementary Training Center located in Gangwon-do, Gangwon-do, and received education for a new illness on December 2, 1998, and was discharged from the hospital on January 27, 1999.

B. On April 18, 201, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State, in the event that a mental fission was caused by two assistant instructors during the training, and the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State.

(1) On August 23, 201 after the deliberation and resolution of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement, the head of the Gu rendered a disposition corresponding to the requirements for persons of distinguished services to the State on the ground that “it is difficult to recognize the identity of a person of distinguished services to the State, considering that there is a medical opinion from a medical specialist that it is difficult to recognize the identity of a person of distinguished services, except in the case where a person of distinguished services was damaged by two parts due to an external disorder caused by the old, etc., and there is no objective data to deem that the Plaintiff was suffering from extreme stress to the extent that it is difficult to cause a mental disorder in the military life.”

The Plaintiff filed an administrative litigation on November 16, 201, and the Gwangju District Court dismissed the Plaintiff’s claim on January 31, 2013 (No. 11Guhap4138), and the Plaintiff appealed on it, and the Gwangju High Court dismissed the Plaintiff’s appeal on August 22, 2013 (No. 2013Nu412), and the Plaintiff appealed on it (No. 2013Nu412), and the Supreme Court dismissed the Plaintiff’s appeal on December 12, 2013.

(2013Du19202). (c)

In other words, on January 15, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State on the ground that there was a mental fissiona due to two teaching assistants during the training (hereinafter “instant injury and disease”).

Accordingly, the defendant does not have objective and specific supporting materials that the plaintiff's injury to the disease of this case occurred as a proximate causal relation with military duties and education and training as a result of a comprehensive examination of related data, and the plaintiff's request in the existing administrative litigation