The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) sentenced by the court below (the sentence of two years of suspended sentence in August, and the community service order of 80 hours) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant recognizes the crime of this case, and the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment due to the obstruction of performance of official duties during the last ten years is favorable to the defendant.

However, considering the aforementioned circumstances, even if considering the circumstances as seen earlier, the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable, even if it is too unreasonable for the defendant to take into account such factors as the circumstances unfavorable to the defendant, including the fact that he/she has been punished as a crime of obstructing the performance of official duties and obstructing the performance of official duties in a deceptive scheme, and that he/she has been punished several times for violence-related crimes, and other various circumstances, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive for the instant crime, and circumstances after the crime.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.