Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 12,000,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On May 25, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million by the Suwon District Court for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

On December 17, 2019, even though the Defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving regulations, the Defendant again driven C Laren car at a section of about 3 km from the insular area of Suwon-si, Suwon-si (hereinafter referred to as Suwon-si) to the front road of the same Gu, under the influence of alcohol of about 0.165% of the blood algo (0.165%).

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the occurrence of the case;

1. Report on the circumstantial statement, investigation report, and notification of the results of the control of drinking driving;

1. Records of judgment: The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records, amounts of dispositions and results confirmation reports;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty for a crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground of sentencing of the provisional payment order is that the defendant, who has a record of driving a drunk, drives a motor vehicle again, and the nature of the crime is not less than that of the crime, but the result of the blood alcohol concentration due to drinking in this case is higher.

However, in light of various circumstances, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and result of the crime, etc., the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the defendant recognized the crime of this case and divided his mistake; (b) the defendant did not have any other criminal records other than the above one-time fine; and (c) the defendant's drinking driving record has passed more than 12 years since the date of the crime of this case; and (d)