logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2014.12.11 2013가합11141
채무부존재확인
Text

1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) paid KRW 250,264,106 to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and its related amount from June 23, 2012 to December 11, 2014.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. On October 30, 2008, the Plaintiff entered into an insurance contract with the Defendant for non-distribution of dividends as indicated in Paragraph 2 of the attached Table No. 2 with which the insured is the Defendant (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”).

B. At around 21:20 on June 23, 2012, the Defendant: (a) driven a B body-ray car owned by himself; (b) got away from the road to the left-hand side of the progress direction while driving the road one-lane road in front of the village of Cheongam University at the seat of the commercial Myeon Office at the seat of the commercial Myeono University; and (c) caused an accident that meets the landscape trees, communications owners, low temperature storage, etc. (hereinafter “instant accident”); and (d) sustained injury, such as the dives of the eromatic erostroke, taking a eromatic erostroke, taking a eromatic erostroke, taking the side of the village of Cheongam University at the seat of the commercial Doo University (hereinafter “instant accident”).

C. From June 23, 2012, the Defendant at C Hospital

7.6. On June 25, 2012, the date following the date when hospitalized treatment was conducted.

6. From July 6, 2012, 26. He/she was under blood control and wing recognization and was under control, and was under control at the Symnae Hospital of the Seoul Annual Generation.

7. A request for hospitalized treatment until 18.

7. Around October 10, 200, aftermathing 6-7, aftermathing 6-7, aftermathing 5-6, aftermathing 1-2, during the chroning 1-2, aftermathing .

The Defendant claimed insurance money against the injury inflicted upon the above accident under the insurance contract of this case, and the Plaintiff paid KRW 2,890,000 to the Plaintiff for the insurance money of general injury injury injury injury, KRW 12,00,000, KRW 12,000, KRW 200,000 for temporary living expenses, and for the pelf video operation expenses.

E. The Defendant claimed an income compensation fund of 50% or more of the general injury guaranteed by the insurance contract of this case against the injury suffered by the Defendant, but the Plaintiff refused payment of insurance money on the ground that the Defendant’s subsequent disability does not constitute a ground for payment of injury income compensation fund of 50% or more under the terms and conditions

F. The instant case.

arrow