1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is that the court below rejected Gap evidence 13, which is insufficient to acknowledge the plaintiff's assertion as additional evidence submitted in the court of first instance, and it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the rejection of the plaintiff's assertion as to the result of inquiry of the fact-finding with respect to the Nansan Hospital Nansan Hospital in the court of first instance, and thus, it cited this as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of

[In accordance with the results of the fact-finding, the plaintiff argued that the difference in this case constitutes a case where cerebral ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic ethic e.